This content may be of interest to you
Resources
Developing your team isn't just about sending everyone to training once a year. Growth happens primarily through day-to-day work—through feedback, new responsibilities, and conversations that help people step back and reflect.
An employee grows when they understand what they do well, what they can improve, and how to take the next step. Managers create the conditions for this growth by providing helpful feedback, asking the right questions, and scheduling regular meetings.
This approach also requires viewing work situations as learning opportunities. A meeting can help improve communication skills. A project can develop decision-making skills. A relationship challenge can become an opportunity for feedback and cooperation. Continuous development thus transforms work experiences into lasting skills. It strengthens autonomy, confidence, and the team’s ability to cope with change.
A team doesn't just improve when its members attend training sessions. It also learns when it receives specific feedback, tries out a new way of working, or analyzes a situation that didn't produce the expected result.
This steady progress addresses several needs. Employees want to know how to improve their work, but they also want to understand how their work contributes to the team’s priorities. Managers, for their part, must foster autonomy without leaving people to face challenges on their own.
Continuous development helps bridge these two expectations. It provides employees with guidelines for growth and gives managers concrete opportunities to support that growth.
This requires distinguishing between three topics:
These topics overlap, but they should not be confused. One employee may be high-performing but still need to develop a new skill. Another may be dedicated but still lack a systematic approach or autonomy.
Managers should therefore avoid limiting development conversations to difficult situations. These conversations should also support employees who are successful and wish to expand their roles.
Useful feedback describes a specific situation and helps the employee adjust their approach. It is not limited to simply saying that the work is satisfactory or unsatisfactory.
Feedback like “That was good” doesn’t help the employee understand what worked. Similarly, “You need to improve” offers no guidance. The employee needs to know what to keep, what to change, and what to try.
Feedback is most useful when it is based on a specific situation. The manager can describe the context, the behavior observed, and the resulting effect.
For example, you could say: “During this morning’s meeting, you spent a lot of time on technical details. The team wasn’t able to clarify the next steps. For the next meeting, start with the decisions that need to be made and save the details for a separate discussion.” This phrasing avoids judging the person. It describes what happened and suggests a course of action.
The manager can also ask the employee how he or she experienced the situation. This does not mean setting aside the manager’s own assessment, but rather supplementing it.
These questions turn feedback into a conversation. The employee doesn't just receive an evaluation; they participate in analyzing their performance.
Feedback often loses its value when it is given several weeks after the situation in question. The employee remembers the context less clearly and finds it harder to understand what they can adjust.
It is not necessary to interrupt every situation to provide immediate feedback. The manager can choose an appropriate time, as long as the issue is not allowed to be forgotten.
Feedback can be provided:
Consistency matters more than quantity. A concise follow-up, sent at the right time, will often be more effective than a long conversation scheduled several months later.
Feedback shouldn't just explain what happened. It should help the employee know what to do next.
The COIN method can help structure this discussion:
This method helps avoid subjective judgments. It makes feedback more concrete and easier to apply.
Effective feedback can also focus on a success. The manager can explain what led to a good result, so that the employee can replicate that approach in other situations. See Encouraging Feedback at Work to learn more about this topic.
A manager doesn't develop their team by always providing the answers. They also help employees analyze a situation, make a decision, and find their own solutions.
This approach requires taking a step back before intervening. When an employee encounters a difficulty, the manager may be tempted to step in immediately. While this resolves the problem in the short term, it does not necessarily foster the employee’s autonomy.
A manager-coach’s approach involves asking questions that help employees take a step back:
The manager isn't trying to drag out the conversation. He helps the employee clarify his thoughts and make a more informed decision.
He can also rephrase what he understands. This rephrasing helps ensure that the problem has been correctly identified and that both people are talking about the same situation.
“If I understand correctly, your difficulty stems less from the task itself than from a lack of prioritization among the various requests.” This statement can help the employee shift his perspective. It may not be a matter of working harder, but rather of clarifying trade-offs.
The manager-coach does not leave the employee to deal with a difficult issue on their own. They tailor their approach to the situation, the employee’s level of experience, and their degree of autonomy.
An employee who is new to a project will need more guidance. The manager can explain the method, provide an example, or schedule an initial follow-up meeting.
An experienced person can look for the solution on their own, with less frequent follow-ups. The manager will remain available in case of a roadblock, without automatically stepping in.
Support can take many forms:
A manager must also know how to switch between different roles. He or she can coach in a learning situation and then give clear instructions when an urgent decision needs to be made.
The manager-coach doesn't give up on leading. He or she helps employees develop their ability to think and act. Discover the Manager-Coach Training Program to learn more about this approach.
Building a team requires understanding that not all employees learn in the same way. Some need to take action quickly. Others need more context, structure, or time to articulate their point of view.
Emotional intelligence helps managers better identify these differences. It involves, in particular, understanding one’s own reactions, recognizing those of others, and adjusting one’s communication accordingly.
When dealing with an employee who is highly results-oriented, the manager can quickly get to the point and specify the expected decision. With someone who needs more reassurance, the manager will take the time to explain the context and the steps involved.
The DISC model can provide a useful framework for understanding people, as long as we don't pigeonhole them into a single category. It can help us reflect on communication preferences:
These profiles are not labels. The same person may react differently depending on the situation, their level of experience, or the pressure they feel.
The manager might therefore ask himself:
Adapting your communication doesn't mean sacrificing clarity. The expectations remain the same. It's the way you explain and support them that may change.
Emotional intelligence is also important for managers. A reaction of anger, impatience, or anxiety can affect the quality of a conversation.
When an employee fails to meet expectations, a manager may be tempted to speak more quickly, make more arguments, or take back control. Taking a few moments to recognize your own reaction allows you to choose a more helpful response.
This can start with a simple question: “How does this situation make me feel, and what approach will truly help the employee improve?” Taking this step back protects the relationship without compromising on standards. It allows the manager to express things more clearly.
Continuous development does not rely on occasional conversations. It requires regular meetings that give the team a space to learn, adjust its practices, and share its challenges.
One-on-one meetings provide an opportunity to discuss actual work, priorities, and areas for growth. They should not become merely a review of tasks.
The manager can use this time to focus on a skill, a recent situation, or a decision that needs to be made. An individual review can be structured around four questions:
These meetings also help identify needs before they become problems. An employee may ask for support, report feeling overwhelmed, or express a desire to take on new responsibilities. See Weekly one-on-one meetings to structure these discussions.
Team meetings can also be opportunities for growth. After a project or a challenge, take the time to reflect on:
A brief debrief may be sufficient. The goal is not to analyze every action, but to turn the experience into a collective learning opportunity.
A manager can also ask an employee to present a method, share feedback, or lead part of the meeting. These responsibilities help develop public speaking skills, the ability to summarize information, and independence. See Team Rituals to find suitable formats.
Development rituals must remain aligned with the team’s pace. Their effectiveness depends less on their sophistication than on their consistency. A weekly check-in, a post-project debrief, or a monthly review of priorities can already create momentum for progress. Above all, the manager must ensure that these meetings yield results: a decision, a lesson learned, an adjustment, or the next step.
Managers create the conditions for growth, but they cannot be solely responsible for the development of each employee.
Everyone must also learn to identify their needs, ask for feedback, and seize opportunities to experiment. The manager’s role is to make these steps possible and then support their implementation.
Development becomes more tangible when an employee can answer three questions:
Training can provide useful concepts. The manager must then help the employee apply them in a real-world project, meeting, or conversation.
Development interviews provide an additional opportunity to step back and reflect. They allow you to discuss your aspirations, the skills you need to develop, and the conditions necessary for success. See Development Interviews: Driving Sustainable Progress to learn more about this approach.
Continuously developing your team relies on four complementary practices:
Progress, therefore, does not depend solely on the training programs offered. It is built through the way we work, make decisions, provide feedback, and discuss challenges.
A team makes progress when its members understand what they can improve and have concrete opportunities to do so. The manager plays a central role in this process. They provide useful feedback, ask questions, tailor their support, and schedule meetings that allow the team to learn from real-world work experiences. Continuously developing your team doesn’t require implementing a multitude of programs. Above all, it requires making progress a regular, concrete, and shared focus.
Developing your team isn't just about sending everyone to training once a year. Growth happens primarily through day-to-day work—through feedback, new responsibilities, and conversations that help people step back and reflect.
An employee grows when they understand what they do well, what they can improve, and how to take the next step. Managers create the conditions for this growth by providing helpful feedback, asking the right questions, and scheduling regular meetings.
This approach also requires viewing work situations as learning opportunities. A meeting can help improve communication skills. A project can develop decision-making skills. A relationship challenge can become an opportunity for feedback and cooperation. Continuous development thus transforms work experiences into lasting skills. It strengthens autonomy, confidence, and the team’s ability to cope with change.
A team doesn't just improve when its members attend training sessions. It also learns when it receives specific feedback, tries out a new way of working, or analyzes a situation that didn't produce the expected result.
This steady progress addresses several needs. Employees want to know how to improve their work, but they also want to understand how their work contributes to the team’s priorities. Managers, for their part, must foster autonomy without leaving people to face challenges on their own.
Continuous development helps bridge these two expectations. It provides employees with guidelines for growth and gives managers concrete opportunities to support that growth.
This requires distinguishing between three topics:
These topics overlap, but they should not be confused. One employee may be high-performing but still need to develop a new skill. Another may be dedicated but still lack a systematic approach or autonomy.
Managers should therefore avoid limiting development conversations to difficult situations. These conversations should also support employees who are successful and wish to expand their roles.
Useful feedback describes a specific situation and helps the employee adjust their approach. It is not limited to simply saying that the work is satisfactory or unsatisfactory.
Feedback like “That was good” doesn’t help the employee understand what worked. Similarly, “You need to improve” offers no guidance. The employee needs to know what to keep, what to change, and what to try.
Feedback is most useful when it is based on a specific situation. The manager can describe the context, the behavior observed, and the resulting effect.
For example, you could say: “During this morning’s meeting, you spent a lot of time on technical details. The team wasn’t able to clarify the next steps. For the next meeting, start with the decisions that need to be made and save the details for a separate discussion.” This phrasing avoids judging the person. It describes what happened and suggests a course of action.
The manager can also ask the employee how he or she experienced the situation. This does not mean setting aside the manager’s own assessment, but rather supplementing it.
These questions turn feedback into a conversation. The employee doesn't just receive an evaluation; they participate in analyzing their performance.
Feedback often loses its value when it is given several weeks after the situation in question. The employee remembers the context less clearly and finds it harder to understand what they can adjust.
It is not necessary to interrupt every situation to provide immediate feedback. The manager can choose an appropriate time, as long as the issue is not allowed to be forgotten.
Feedback can be provided:
Consistency matters more than quantity. A concise follow-up, sent at the right time, will often be more effective than a long conversation scheduled several months later.
Feedback shouldn't just explain what happened. It should help the employee know what to do next.
The COIN method can help structure this discussion:
This method helps avoid subjective judgments. It makes feedback more concrete and easier to apply.
Effective feedback can also focus on a success. The manager can explain what led to a good result, so that the employee can replicate that approach in other situations. See Encouraging Feedback at Work to learn more about this topic.
A manager doesn't develop their team by always providing the answers. They also help employees analyze a situation, make a decision, and find their own solutions.
This approach requires taking a step back before intervening. When an employee encounters a difficulty, the manager may be tempted to step in immediately. While this resolves the problem in the short term, it does not necessarily foster the employee’s autonomy.
A manager-coach’s approach involves asking questions that help employees take a step back:
The manager isn't trying to drag out the conversation. He helps the employee clarify his thoughts and make a more informed decision.
He can also rephrase what he understands. This rephrasing helps ensure that the problem has been correctly identified and that both people are talking about the same situation.
“If I understand correctly, your difficulty stems less from the task itself than from a lack of prioritization among the various requests.” This statement can help the employee shift his perspective. It may not be a matter of working harder, but rather of clarifying trade-offs.
The manager-coach does not leave the employee to deal with a difficult issue on their own. They tailor their approach to the situation, the employee’s level of experience, and their degree of autonomy.
An employee who is new to a project will need more guidance. The manager can explain the method, provide an example, or schedule an initial follow-up meeting.
An experienced person can look for the solution on their own, with less frequent follow-ups. The manager will remain available in case of a roadblock, without automatically stepping in.
Support can take many forms:
A manager must also know how to switch between different roles. He or she can coach in a learning situation and then give clear instructions when an urgent decision needs to be made.
The manager-coach doesn't give up on leading. He or she helps employees develop their ability to think and act. Discover the Manager-Coach Training Program to learn more about this approach.
Building a team requires understanding that not all employees learn in the same way. Some need to take action quickly. Others need more context, structure, or time to articulate their point of view.
Emotional intelligence helps managers better identify these differences. It involves, in particular, understanding one’s own reactions, recognizing those of others, and adjusting one’s communication accordingly.
When dealing with an employee who is highly results-oriented, the manager can quickly get to the point and specify the expected decision. With someone who needs more reassurance, the manager will take the time to explain the context and the steps involved.
The DISC model can provide a useful framework for understanding people, as long as we don't pigeonhole them into a single category. It can help us reflect on communication preferences:
These profiles are not labels. The same person may react differently depending on the situation, their level of experience, or the pressure they feel.
The manager might therefore ask himself:
Adapting your communication doesn't mean sacrificing clarity. The expectations remain the same. It's the way you explain and support them that may change.
Emotional intelligence is also important for managers. A reaction of anger, impatience, or anxiety can affect the quality of a conversation.
When an employee fails to meet expectations, a manager may be tempted to speak more quickly, make more arguments, or take back control. Taking a few moments to recognize your own reaction allows you to choose a more helpful response.
This can start with a simple question: “How does this situation make me feel, and what approach will truly help the employee improve?” Taking this step back protects the relationship without compromising on standards. It allows the manager to express things more clearly.
Continuous development does not rely on occasional conversations. It requires regular meetings that give the team a space to learn, adjust its practices, and share its challenges.
One-on-one meetings provide an opportunity to discuss actual work, priorities, and areas for growth. They should not become merely a review of tasks.
The manager can use this time to focus on a skill, a recent situation, or a decision that needs to be made. An individual review can be structured around four questions:
These meetings also help identify needs before they become problems. An employee may ask for support, report feeling overwhelmed, or express a desire to take on new responsibilities. See Weekly one-on-one meetings to structure these discussions.
Team meetings can also be opportunities for growth. After a project or a challenge, take the time to reflect on:
A brief debrief may be sufficient. The goal is not to analyze every action, but to turn the experience into a collective learning opportunity.
A manager can also ask an employee to present a method, share feedback, or lead part of the meeting. These responsibilities help develop public speaking skills, the ability to summarize information, and independence. See Team Rituals to find suitable formats.
Development rituals must remain aligned with the team’s pace. Their effectiveness depends less on their sophistication than on their consistency. A weekly check-in, a post-project debrief, or a monthly review of priorities can already create momentum for progress. Above all, the manager must ensure that these meetings yield results: a decision, a lesson learned, an adjustment, or the next step.
Managers create the conditions for growth, but they cannot be solely responsible for the development of each employee.
Everyone must also learn to identify their needs, ask for feedback, and seize opportunities to experiment. The manager’s role is to make these steps possible and then support their implementation.
Development becomes more tangible when an employee can answer three questions:
Training can provide useful concepts. The manager must then help the employee apply them in a real-world project, meeting, or conversation.
Development interviews provide an additional opportunity to step back and reflect. They allow you to discuss your aspirations, the skills you need to develop, and the conditions necessary for success. See Development Interviews: Driving Sustainable Progress to learn more about this approach.
Continuously developing your team relies on four complementary practices:
Progress, therefore, does not depend solely on the training programs offered. It is built through the way we work, make decisions, provide feedback, and discuss challenges.
A team makes progress when its members understand what they can improve and have concrete opportunities to do so. The manager plays a central role in this process. They provide useful feedback, ask questions, tailor their support, and schedule meetings that allow the team to learn from real-world work experiences. Continuously developing your team doesn’t require implementing a multitude of programs. Above all, it requires making progress a regular, concrete, and shared focus.
Discover all our courses and workshops to address the most critical management and leadership challenges.
Training organisation registered under the number 11755339875. This registration does not imply state approval.
.svg)
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
