This content may be of interest to you
Resources
Performance management is not about constantly demanding more or increasing the number of checks. It begins with a clear direction, appropriate resources, and regular communication, so that everyone knows what they are expected to accomplish, with what resources, and within what framework.
However, this requirement is difficult to meet when teams are already under pressure. Priorities shift, dashboards pile up, and employees expect more autonomy and clarity. By focusing solely on results, we end up forgetting the conditions that make them possible.
Effective performance management balances high standards with commitment. It provides direction, supports progress, and builds enough trust to address challenges before they become entrenched.
Performance management links goals, work monitoring, skills development, and managerial conversations. It is therefore not just about measuring a result, but about understanding what enables a team to achieve it under the right conditions.
An employee may fail to meet a goal because the priority was not clearly defined, the workload was too heavy, or a skill still needed to be developed. The employee may also face issues related to resources, coordination, or cooperation. Before concluding that there is a lack of commitment, the manager must look at the situation as a whole.
The annual review can contribute to this monitoring process, but it is not enough. Performance is also shaped through one-on-one meetings, team meetings, feedback sessions, and decisions made throughout projects. The manager doesn’t just discover it at the end of the quarter; he or she supports it on a daily basis.
A useful objective provides direction without turning every step into a check. It specifies the expected outcome, the criteria for success, and the discretion allowed to the employee.
For it to make sense, the manager must be able to explain how it relates to the team’s priorities. In particular, the manager can ask three questions:
These questions help ensure that goals aren't set simply because they're easy to measure. They also help ensure that everyone understands their role and the resources available to them.
“Improving customer satisfaction,” for example, remains too vague. A more specific goal might be to reduce the average turnaround time for requests by a set date, while maintaining the expected level of quality. This example is illustrative, but it shows how to move from a general intention to an observable result.
The SMART method can help in setting goals. However, it is no substitute for a conversation with a manager. A goal can be specific yet still unrealistic if the context, resources, or priorities have changed.
A performance metric should help inform decision-making. When it is used solely to identify discrepancies or to require more reporting, it can sometimes distract managers from their actual work.
Before adding a metric, you should therefore ask yourself what it will help you adjust. Should it help you reassess a priority, free up a resource, strengthen support, or change a deadline? If no action results from the data, its place in the monitoring process warrants scrutiny.
In a support team, the manager may observe:
These pieces of information don't tell the whole story. Taken together, they provide a more accurate picture of the situation. A temporary decline may be part of a learning curve. An improvement in results may also mask long-term fatigue.
Follow-up check-ins then make it possible to turn this information into decisions. During these check-ins, the manager can review what’s moving forward, what’s holding things up, what needs to be clarified, and what support is needed to take the next step. The goal is not to create yet another meeting, but to maintain a productive dialogue about the work.
To learn more about this topic, see Managing Performance in Times of Stress.
Delegation improves performance when it empowers employees to succeed. It does not mean simply handing off a task and then walking away. The manager must clearly define the assignment, responsibilities, available resources, and when follow-up will be necessary.
A simple framework can clarify:
For a newsletter campaign, for example, a manager might request a first draft by Friday, authorize the use of the design team, and schedule a joint review the day before. The employee then knows the goal, the available resources, and the level of oversight planned.
This framework should then evolve as experience is gained. Someone who is new to a role will need more guidance. As their skills and confidence grow, the manager can step back and give them more room to make decisions.
Delegation isn't based solely on trust. It relies on a framework that is clear enough to allow trust to develop. To explore this topic in greater depth, check out the "Delegation and Performance" training course.
Tools and metrics alone are not enough to foster a culture of high performance. A manager’s approach directly influences the quality of communication, the level of trust, and the team’s ability to discuss challenges.
A hands-on manager creates regular opportunities to discuss work without constantly seeking approval. A one-on-one meeting, a debrief after a meeting, or a question asked at the right moment can be enough to identify a roadblock before it escalates.
Clarity also plays an important role. When a deliverable isn’t submitted on time, the manager might say: “I noticed that the report wasn’t sent as planned. We need it tomorrow. What held things up this week?” This phrasing is based on a fact and opens up a discussion. It then makes it possible to understand the difficulty, clarify expectations, and agree on the next steps.
Managers also protect performance when they know how to set boundaries. Rejecting a secondary priority, ensuring time for focused work, or correcting a behavior can prevent stress and tension from becoming chronic.
A decline in performance should be addressed based on observable facts, a direct conversation, and a follow-up plan. The longer the manager waits, the more difficult it may become to clarify the situation.
First, he must distinguish between facts and interpretations. Saying that the last two shipments arrived after the scheduled deadline opens up a discussion. Saying that the employee isn’t sufficiently committed quickly turns the conversation into a judgment call.
The challenge may stem from a skill gap, an excessive workload, a conflicting priority, or a lack of support. A question like “What’s preventing you from achieving the expected result today?” helps identify the obstacle before deciding on the next steps.
The manager can then work with the employee to develop a development plan. The plan specifies:
Depending on the situation, the plan may include pairing employees, targeted training, clarifying priorities, or more regular support.
Maintaining high standards does not mean ignoring the conditions for success. It means making the path to progress clear enough. To learn more about this topic, see Poor Performance at Work: Re-engage or Terminate?.
Sustained performance also depends on an employee’s ability to learn, ask for help, and gradually take on more responsibility. Skills development must therefore remain tied to actual work.
Managers can create learning opportunities by assigning a new task, organizing a debrief, or pairing an employee with a mentor. These moments give employees the chance to put a skill to the test and receive feedback they can put to immediate use.
Feedback shouldn't have to wait until the annual review. It can pertain to a decision, an interaction, a skill, or a result. To be useful, it describes a specific situation, explains the impact it had, and suggests a path for improvement.
Development interviews then provide an opportunity to take a broader perspective. During these interviews, the manager can explore the skills that need to be developed, the assignments that would help the employee grow, and the conditions necessary for success. See also Continuously Developing Your Team.
Performance management relies on a clear framework, understandable goals, and metrics that actually enable action. It also requires regular check-ins, gradual delegation, and direct conversations when situations become complicated.
Performance, therefore, does not depend solely on the pressure exerted by the manager. It also depends on the quality of the framework provided to the team and the manager’s ability to tailor their support.
Motivating employees without demotivating them does not mean lowering standards. It means providing clear direction, monitoring progress with discernment, and allowing genuine room for initiative. Managers must also address difficulties promptly, understand what’s holding people back, and offer appropriate support. When expectations are clear and communication is regular, performance becomes a shared focus rather than simply a result to be evaluated. To help your managers structure these conversations, check out the Performance Review Training.
Performance management is not about constantly demanding more or increasing the number of checks. It begins with a clear direction, appropriate resources, and regular communication, so that everyone knows what they are expected to accomplish, with what resources, and within what framework.
However, this requirement is difficult to meet when teams are already under pressure. Priorities shift, dashboards pile up, and employees expect more autonomy and clarity. By focusing solely on results, we end up forgetting the conditions that make them possible.
Effective performance management balances high standards with commitment. It provides direction, supports progress, and builds enough trust to address challenges before they become entrenched.
Performance management links goals, work monitoring, skills development, and managerial conversations. It is therefore not just about measuring a result, but about understanding what enables a team to achieve it under the right conditions.
An employee may fail to meet a goal because the priority was not clearly defined, the workload was too heavy, or a skill still needed to be developed. The employee may also face issues related to resources, coordination, or cooperation. Before concluding that there is a lack of commitment, the manager must look at the situation as a whole.
The annual review can contribute to this monitoring process, but it is not enough. Performance is also shaped through one-on-one meetings, team meetings, feedback sessions, and decisions made throughout projects. The manager doesn’t just discover it at the end of the quarter; he or she supports it on a daily basis.
A useful objective provides direction without turning every step into a check. It specifies the expected outcome, the criteria for success, and the discretion allowed to the employee.
For it to make sense, the manager must be able to explain how it relates to the team’s priorities. In particular, the manager can ask three questions:
These questions help ensure that goals aren't set simply because they're easy to measure. They also help ensure that everyone understands their role and the resources available to them.
“Improving customer satisfaction,” for example, remains too vague. A more specific goal might be to reduce the average turnaround time for requests by a set date, while maintaining the expected level of quality. This example is illustrative, but it shows how to move from a general intention to an observable result.
The SMART method can help in setting goals. However, it is no substitute for a conversation with a manager. A goal can be specific yet still unrealistic if the context, resources, or priorities have changed.
A performance metric should help inform decision-making. When it is used solely to identify discrepancies or to require more reporting, it can sometimes distract managers from their actual work.
Before adding a metric, you should therefore ask yourself what it will help you adjust. Should it help you reassess a priority, free up a resource, strengthen support, or change a deadline? If no action results from the data, its place in the monitoring process warrants scrutiny.
In a support team, the manager may observe:
These pieces of information don't tell the whole story. Taken together, they provide a more accurate picture of the situation. A temporary decline may be part of a learning curve. An improvement in results may also mask long-term fatigue.
Follow-up check-ins then make it possible to turn this information into decisions. During these check-ins, the manager can review what’s moving forward, what’s holding things up, what needs to be clarified, and what support is needed to take the next step. The goal is not to create yet another meeting, but to maintain a productive dialogue about the work.
To learn more about this topic, see Managing Performance in Times of Stress.
Delegation improves performance when it empowers employees to succeed. It does not mean simply handing off a task and then walking away. The manager must clearly define the assignment, responsibilities, available resources, and when follow-up will be necessary.
A simple framework can clarify:
For a newsletter campaign, for example, a manager might request a first draft by Friday, authorize the use of the design team, and schedule a joint review the day before. The employee then knows the goal, the available resources, and the level of oversight planned.
This framework should then evolve as experience is gained. Someone who is new to a role will need more guidance. As their skills and confidence grow, the manager can step back and give them more room to make decisions.
Delegation isn't based solely on trust. It relies on a framework that is clear enough to allow trust to develop. To explore this topic in greater depth, check out the "Delegation and Performance" training course.
Tools and metrics alone are not enough to foster a culture of high performance. A manager’s approach directly influences the quality of communication, the level of trust, and the team’s ability to discuss challenges.
A hands-on manager creates regular opportunities to discuss work without constantly seeking approval. A one-on-one meeting, a debrief after a meeting, or a question asked at the right moment can be enough to identify a roadblock before it escalates.
Clarity also plays an important role. When a deliverable isn’t submitted on time, the manager might say: “I noticed that the report wasn’t sent as planned. We need it tomorrow. What held things up this week?” This phrasing is based on a fact and opens up a discussion. It then makes it possible to understand the difficulty, clarify expectations, and agree on the next steps.
Managers also protect performance when they know how to set boundaries. Rejecting a secondary priority, ensuring time for focused work, or correcting a behavior can prevent stress and tension from becoming chronic.
A decline in performance should be addressed based on observable facts, a direct conversation, and a follow-up plan. The longer the manager waits, the more difficult it may become to clarify the situation.
First, he must distinguish between facts and interpretations. Saying that the last two shipments arrived after the scheduled deadline opens up a discussion. Saying that the employee isn’t sufficiently committed quickly turns the conversation into a judgment call.
The challenge may stem from a skill gap, an excessive workload, a conflicting priority, or a lack of support. A question like “What’s preventing you from achieving the expected result today?” helps identify the obstacle before deciding on the next steps.
The manager can then work with the employee to develop a development plan. The plan specifies:
Depending on the situation, the plan may include pairing employees, targeted training, clarifying priorities, or more regular support.
Maintaining high standards does not mean ignoring the conditions for success. It means making the path to progress clear enough. To learn more about this topic, see Poor Performance at Work: Re-engage or Terminate?.
Sustained performance also depends on an employee’s ability to learn, ask for help, and gradually take on more responsibility. Skills development must therefore remain tied to actual work.
Managers can create learning opportunities by assigning a new task, organizing a debrief, or pairing an employee with a mentor. These moments give employees the chance to put a skill to the test and receive feedback they can put to immediate use.
Feedback shouldn't have to wait until the annual review. It can pertain to a decision, an interaction, a skill, or a result. To be useful, it describes a specific situation, explains the impact it had, and suggests a path for improvement.
Development interviews then provide an opportunity to take a broader perspective. During these interviews, the manager can explore the skills that need to be developed, the assignments that would help the employee grow, and the conditions necessary for success. See also Continuously Developing Your Team.
Performance management relies on a clear framework, understandable goals, and metrics that actually enable action. It also requires regular check-ins, gradual delegation, and direct conversations when situations become complicated.
Performance, therefore, does not depend solely on the pressure exerted by the manager. It also depends on the quality of the framework provided to the team and the manager’s ability to tailor their support.
Motivating employees without demotivating them does not mean lowering standards. It means providing clear direction, monitoring progress with discernment, and allowing genuine room for initiative. Managers must also address difficulties promptly, understand what’s holding people back, and offer appropriate support. When expectations are clear and communication is regular, performance becomes a shared focus rather than simply a result to be evaluated. To help your managers structure these conversations, check out the Performance Review Training.
Discover all our courses and workshops to address the most critical management and leadership challenges.
Training organisation registered under the number 11755339875. This registration does not imply state approval.
.svg)
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
