This content may be of interest to you
Resources
Conducting an annual review is not simply a matter of reading from a checklist and going through a list of comments. The manager must create the conditions for a clear, balanced, and productive discussion that will be useful moving forward. The annual review provides an opportunity to take stock of the work accomplished, discuss challenges, and set priorities for the future. The quality of the meeting depends as much on its content as on the way the manager leads the conversation.
There are preparatory steps to take beforehand. These are covered on a dedicated page: Preparing for an Annual Performance Review. This article focuses on the moment the discussion takes place: setting the context, active listening, providing feedback, addressing disagreements, and establishing follow-up commitments.
An annual review begins with a clear framework. The employee should know how long the meeting is scheduled to last, what topics will be discussed, and what role they can play in the discussion. Don’t start right away with an evaluation. Take a few minutes to review the purpose of the meeting.
Can you explain:
"The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on the past year, understand what helped or hindered your work, and then set priorities for the future. I suggest we start with your own assessment." This opening sets the tone. It also shows that the meeting won’t be a monologue by the manager.
Ask the employee to speak first about the past year.
You can ask him these questions:
Listen to the answer before giving your own analysis. You can then compare your perceptions and explore the differences in more depth.
Active listening helps you understand what the employee really thinks about their year. It relies on open-ended questions, rephrasing, and pauses that give the employee time to respond. Avoid firing off questions one after another as if you were conducting a survey. Follow up on key points.
This practice prevents hasty interpretations. It allows the employee to correct or clarify what they said.
Silence isn't necessarily a problem that needs to be solved. The employee may need time to formulate a sensitive response. Resist the urge to immediately fill every pause. An important question sometimes deserves a few seconds of thought.
Active listening isn't about staying silent. It's about using your words to help the other person clarify their thoughts.
Useful feedback describes a situation, an observable behavior, and its consequences. It then provides guidance for moving forward.
Avoid general judgments. “You lack thoroughness.” This phrasing does not help the employee understand what needs to change. It can also trigger a defensive reaction. Instead, use a statement grounded in facts: “During the project preparation phase, several important pieces of information were shared after the decision-making meeting. The team had to rush to address certain issues. For the next deadline, we can establish a checkpoint before the meeting.”
This phrasing provides the employee with three key points:
You can use the COIN method to structure your feedback:
A fact describes an observable situation, while an interpretation reflects the judgment you draw from it. Saying , “The meeting minutes weren’t sent out after the meeting,” is based on a verifiable fact. Saying , “You don’t take these issues seriously,” passes judgment on the employee’s attitude.
First, describe what you observed, then let them explain the situation before drawing a conclusion.
Positive feedback isn't just about saying "good job." It should highlight what was helpful and why: "Your analysis helped clarify the decision we needed to make. You distinguished between immediate risks and issues to be addressed later. This approach made it easier for the team to reach a decision."
Specific feedback helps employees understand what they can do again.
A disagreement does not mean the meeting has failed. It often indicates that the manager and the employee do not share the same understanding of the facts, expectations, or priorities.
Don't immediately defend your assessment. Start by understanding the point of disagreement.
You can request:
Next, consider three different situations:
The first one asks you to verify the information. The second one asks you to compare the different perspectives. The third one asks you to clarify what is expected next.
Acknowledging part of a colleague’s point doesn’t mean giving up your position. You can listen to what they’ve been through while staying on topic. For example: “I understand that this decision was difficult for you. Nevertheless, I’d like to return to the topic of its consequences for the team.” This phrasing acknowledges their experience without sidestepping the facts or the responsibility at hand.
An employee may remain silent because they are thinking, protecting themselves, or don’t yet feel confident enough to respond . Don’t jump to the conclusion that they lack engagement. Ask a simple question, then give them time to formulate their answer: “I can see that this topic requires some thought. What do you find most difficult to put into words?”
A manager doesn't always need to solve the problem right away. First, he or she must create the conditions that allow the issue to be brought up.
An annual review should conclude with commitments that are clear to both parties. A general statement of intent is not enough to guide the work over the long term.
Commitments may relate to:
Avoid overly vague phrasing, such as "We need to communicate better." Instead, describe the expected behavior: "Before each project meeting, share the necessary information and highlight the items that require a decision."
A clear commitment also defines the manager's role. For example, you could say: "I'll share this week's priorities with you before our one-on-one meeting. That way, you can let me know if any trade-offs are needed." Everyone then knows what they need to do and how to move forward together.
Don't end the interview without making sure that the commitments have been understood.
You can request:
These questions help identify any misunderstandings before the end of the appointment.
Follow-up gives substance to the decisions made during the annual review. Without follow-up, goals and development actions risk remaining merely on paper.
Document the commitments in a shared document. Include the following:
Follow-up shouldn't have to wait until the next round of meetings. Choose a time that's appropriate for the topic. A development initiative may require prompt feedback. An annual goal may call for several interim check-ins.
"We have identified three commitments: to clarify priorities at the start of each week, to prepare decisions before meetings, and to review these practices together during our next discussion." The minutes should accurately reflect the discussion. Avoid adding decisions that were not discussed.
To sustain these commitments over time, check out the NUMA page dedicated to development discussions.
The manager presents his analysis without giving the employee a chance to speak. The meeting then resembles a one-way presentation. Let the employee contribute to the review and respond to the feedback.
The annual review focuses on work completed and future goals. The career development meeting addresses career progression, skills, and career prospects. These two discussions serve different purposes.
A comment like "you need to be more independent" doesn't make it clear what is expected. Describe an observable situation and suggest a next step.
An objection doesn't always require an immediate response. It may point to a missing fact or a different perspective. Start by asking a question. You can then clarify your own analysis.
A conversation can be pleasant but still be pointless. If no one knows what’s supposed to happen next, the discussion won’t lead to any concrete changes.
Conducting an annual review requires managerial skills, not just a well-filled-out form. The manager must guide the discussion, listen before responding, provide specific feedback, and be open to differing opinions. The discussion should then lead to clear commitments. Follow-up allows you to check what’s progressing, what’s holding things back, and what needs to be adjusted. To prepare for the meeting in advance, check out our guide Preparing for an Effective Annual Performance Review.
Conducting an annual review is not simply a matter of reading from a checklist and going through a list of comments. The manager must create the conditions for a clear, balanced, and productive discussion that will be useful moving forward. The annual review provides an opportunity to take stock of the work accomplished, discuss challenges, and set priorities for the future. The quality of the meeting depends as much on its content as on the way the manager leads the conversation.
There are preparatory steps to take beforehand. These are covered on a dedicated page: Preparing for an Annual Performance Review. This article focuses on the moment the discussion takes place: setting the context, active listening, providing feedback, addressing disagreements, and establishing follow-up commitments.
An annual review begins with a clear framework. The employee should know how long the meeting is scheduled to last, what topics will be discussed, and what role they can play in the discussion. Don’t start right away with an evaluation. Take a few minutes to review the purpose of the meeting.
Can you explain:
"The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on the past year, understand what helped or hindered your work, and then set priorities for the future. I suggest we start with your own assessment." This opening sets the tone. It also shows that the meeting won’t be a monologue by the manager.
Ask the employee to speak first about the past year.
You can ask him these questions:
Listen to the answer before giving your own analysis. You can then compare your perceptions and explore the differences in more depth.
Active listening helps you understand what the employee really thinks about their year. It relies on open-ended questions, rephrasing, and pauses that give the employee time to respond. Avoid firing off questions one after another as if you were conducting a survey. Follow up on key points.
This practice prevents hasty interpretations. It allows the employee to correct or clarify what they said.
Silence isn't necessarily a problem that needs to be solved. The employee may need time to formulate a sensitive response. Resist the urge to immediately fill every pause. An important question sometimes deserves a few seconds of thought.
Active listening isn't about staying silent. It's about using your words to help the other person clarify their thoughts.
Useful feedback describes a situation, an observable behavior, and its consequences. It then provides guidance for moving forward.
Avoid general judgments. “You lack thoroughness.” This phrasing does not help the employee understand what needs to change. It can also trigger a defensive reaction. Instead, use a statement grounded in facts: “During the project preparation phase, several important pieces of information were shared after the decision-making meeting. The team had to rush to address certain issues. For the next deadline, we can establish a checkpoint before the meeting.”
This phrasing provides the employee with three key points:
You can use the COIN method to structure your feedback:
A fact describes an observable situation, while an interpretation reflects the judgment you draw from it. Saying , “The meeting minutes weren’t sent out after the meeting,” is based on a verifiable fact. Saying , “You don’t take these issues seriously,” passes judgment on the employee’s attitude.
First, describe what you observed, then let them explain the situation before drawing a conclusion.
Positive feedback isn't just about saying "good job." It should highlight what was helpful and why: "Your analysis helped clarify the decision we needed to make. You distinguished between immediate risks and issues to be addressed later. This approach made it easier for the team to reach a decision."
Specific feedback helps employees understand what they can do again.
A disagreement does not mean the meeting has failed. It often indicates that the manager and the employee do not share the same understanding of the facts, expectations, or priorities.
Don't immediately defend your assessment. Start by understanding the point of disagreement.
You can request:
Next, consider three different situations:
The first one asks you to verify the information. The second one asks you to compare the different perspectives. The third one asks you to clarify what is expected next.
Acknowledging part of a colleague’s point doesn’t mean giving up your position. You can listen to what they’ve been through while staying on topic. For example: “I understand that this decision was difficult for you. Nevertheless, I’d like to return to the topic of its consequences for the team.” This phrasing acknowledges their experience without sidestepping the facts or the responsibility at hand.
An employee may remain silent because they are thinking, protecting themselves, or don’t yet feel confident enough to respond . Don’t jump to the conclusion that they lack engagement. Ask a simple question, then give them time to formulate their answer: “I can see that this topic requires some thought. What do you find most difficult to put into words?”
A manager doesn't always need to solve the problem right away. First, he or she must create the conditions that allow the issue to be brought up.
An annual review should conclude with commitments that are clear to both parties. A general statement of intent is not enough to guide the work over the long term.
Commitments may relate to:
Avoid overly vague phrasing, such as "We need to communicate better." Instead, describe the expected behavior: "Before each project meeting, share the necessary information and highlight the items that require a decision."
A clear commitment also defines the manager's role. For example, you could say: "I'll share this week's priorities with you before our one-on-one meeting. That way, you can let me know if any trade-offs are needed." Everyone then knows what they need to do and how to move forward together.
Don't end the interview without making sure that the commitments have been understood.
You can request:
These questions help identify any misunderstandings before the end of the appointment.
Follow-up gives substance to the decisions made during the annual review. Without follow-up, goals and development actions risk remaining merely on paper.
Document the commitments in a shared document. Include the following:
Follow-up shouldn't have to wait until the next round of meetings. Choose a time that's appropriate for the topic. A development initiative may require prompt feedback. An annual goal may call for several interim check-ins.
"We have identified three commitments: to clarify priorities at the start of each week, to prepare decisions before meetings, and to review these practices together during our next discussion." The minutes should accurately reflect the discussion. Avoid adding decisions that were not discussed.
To sustain these commitments over time, check out the NUMA page dedicated to development discussions.
The manager presents his analysis without giving the employee a chance to speak. The meeting then resembles a one-way presentation. Let the employee contribute to the review and respond to the feedback.
The annual review focuses on work completed and future goals. The career development meeting addresses career progression, skills, and career prospects. These two discussions serve different purposes.
A comment like "you need to be more independent" doesn't make it clear what is expected. Describe an observable situation and suggest a next step.
An objection doesn't always require an immediate response. It may point to a missing fact or a different perspective. Start by asking a question. You can then clarify your own analysis.
A conversation can be pleasant but still be pointless. If no one knows what’s supposed to happen next, the discussion won’t lead to any concrete changes.
Conducting an annual review requires managerial skills, not just a well-filled-out form. The manager must guide the discussion, listen before responding, provide specific feedback, and be open to differing opinions. The discussion should then lead to clear commitments. Follow-up allows you to check what’s progressing, what’s holding things back, and what needs to be adjusted. To prepare for the meeting in advance, check out our guide Preparing for an Effective Annual Performance Review.
Discover all our courses and workshops to address the most critical management and leadership challenges.
Training organisation registered under the number 11755339875. This registration does not imply state approval.
.svg)
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
