Boomers, Generation X, millennials, Generation Z... Today, several generations live together in companies, with very different points of reference, expectations and communication styles. For a manager, this represents a real challenge: how do you create a committed collective when the visions of work are not aligned?
Intergenerational management does not aim to erase differences, nor to calibrate one's style as if it were a question of satisfying a diversity of internal clients. Above all, it's about adopting a clear stance, establishing a shared framework and mobilizing interpersonal skills to develop a common dynamic, despite differences in pace, language or priorities.
When we talk about intergenerational management, we often think of the need to deal with opposing visions of work. But before even getting into the solutions, take a moment to step back from your own representations. All too often, teams hear :
These generalizations say nothing about people. Above all, they reflect what we project onto others. The real issue is not the age difference, but what we do with it. To overcome this, and above all to move beyond it to build the right team dynamics:
This posture of questioning allows us to get away from labels and get back to basics: understanding the people we manage.
Working with widely differing profiles requires the reinforcement of specific managerial skills. You don't need an infinite toolbox: a few solid reflexes are all it takes to smooth cooperation and bring out collective intelligence.
Managing employees from different generations doesn't mean having to work on a case-by-case basis. It's more a question of knowing how to manage different styles without losing consistency: the same message, the same rule, can be understood differently according to different points of reference and experience. It's up to you to adapt a clear... and flexible posture.
What you can do :
For example, for the same feedback - a salesperson with a more extroverted personality might prefer a quick call during the day to check in and debrief. Conversely, a more introverted profile might prefer an asynchronous message to share the feedback and possibly propose a dedicated time for exchange.
Collaborative leadership isn't about "letting everyone else do it". It's about creating spaces where everyone can actively contributeregardless of seniority, pace or vision of work.
In concrete terms, this means :
Example: An HR manager entrusts a junior/senior duo with the task of optimizing the onboarding of new recruits. The former contributes his ideas for tools, the latter his insight into the challenges of integration. The result: a more relevant deliverable and a dynamic of cooperation.
When expectations vary from one employee to another, it's tempting to adapt to each one. But by personalizing everything, we lose the collective coherence. What we need is a clear framework for all, with flexibility within it.
To implement :
Example: A project team collectively decides to impose a fixed 30-minute weekly check-in, but everyone remains free to organize their tasks as they see fit, as long as deadlines are met.
We often hear that each generation has its own engagement drivers. In reality, the levers are not linked to age, but to the individual. What energizes one generation (recognition, impact, progression...) may leave another completely indifferent.
As a manager, your role is not to guess what motivates your employees, nor to fall into ready-made recipes. Your role is to create the conditions for everyone to express what drives them... and to connect these aspirations to the collective project.
A team needs a shared sense of purpose, beyond the day-to-day tasks. Knowing why you're doing something, what you're contributing to and what you're building together: these are fundamentals for all generations.
To set up :
Example: At a team meeting, a marketing manager takes 5 minutes to explain how a campaign in preparation fits into the overall growth strategy. Result: more involvement, less mechanical execution.
One is looking to make rapid progress. Another wants to stabilize his position. A third feels useful when passing on his knowledge. It's up to you toidentify these dynamics and give everyone the opportunity to get involved in their own way.
To implement :
Example: An IT manager realizes that a senior developer is beginning to tire of purely technical matters. He offers him the opportunity to pilot the integration of new arrivals for 3 months. The employee finds a new sense of purpose, without having to change jobs.
Recognition is a universal lever, but it doesn't take the same form for everyone. Some prefer unobtrusive feedback, others a show of appreciation in a meeting. Some want recognition for progress, others for performance.
Test it in your management routine:
Example: A manager gets into the habit of opening each team meeting with a "spotlight" on a useful contribution made during the week. Little by little, her colleagues do the same among themselves.
Rather than seeking to satisfy each generation individually, rely on clarity, trust and cooperation. These are the three pillars that enable each person to contribute in his or her own way, while moving forward in a collective direction. A good intergenerational manager is not one who masters the clichés associated with each generation.
He's the one who knows best:
Boomers, Generation X, millennials, Generation Z... Today, several generations live together in companies, with very different points of reference, expectations and communication styles. For a manager, this represents a real challenge: how do you create a committed collective when the visions of work are not aligned?
Intergenerational management does not aim to erase differences, nor to calibrate one's style as if it were a question of satisfying a diversity of internal clients. Above all, it's about adopting a clear stance, establishing a shared framework and mobilizing interpersonal skills to develop a common dynamic, despite differences in pace, language or priorities.
When we talk about intergenerational management, we often think of the need to deal with opposing visions of work. But before even getting into the solutions, take a moment to step back from your own representations. All too often, teams hear :
These generalizations say nothing about people. Above all, they reflect what we project onto others. The real issue is not the age difference, but what we do with it. To overcome this, and above all to move beyond it to build the right team dynamics:
This posture of questioning allows us to get away from labels and get back to basics: understanding the people we manage.
Working with widely differing profiles requires the reinforcement of specific managerial skills. You don't need an infinite toolbox: a few solid reflexes are all it takes to smooth cooperation and bring out collective intelligence.
Managing employees from different generations doesn't mean having to work on a case-by-case basis. It's more a question of knowing how to manage different styles without losing consistency: the same message, the same rule, can be understood differently according to different points of reference and experience. It's up to you to adapt a clear... and flexible posture.
What you can do :
For example, for the same feedback - a salesperson with a more extroverted personality might prefer a quick call during the day to check in and debrief. Conversely, a more introverted profile might prefer an asynchronous message to share the feedback and possibly propose a dedicated time for exchange.
Collaborative leadership isn't about "letting everyone else do it". It's about creating spaces where everyone can actively contributeregardless of seniority, pace or vision of work.
In concrete terms, this means :
Example: An HR manager entrusts a junior/senior duo with the task of optimizing the onboarding of new recruits. The former contributes his ideas for tools, the latter his insight into the challenges of integration. The result: a more relevant deliverable and a dynamic of cooperation.
When expectations vary from one employee to another, it's tempting to adapt to each one. But by personalizing everything, we lose the collective coherence. What we need is a clear framework for all, with flexibility within it.
To implement :
Example: A project team collectively decides to impose a fixed 30-minute weekly check-in, but everyone remains free to organize their tasks as they see fit, as long as deadlines are met.
We often hear that each generation has its own engagement drivers. In reality, the levers are not linked to age, but to the individual. What energizes one generation (recognition, impact, progression...) may leave another completely indifferent.
As a manager, your role is not to guess what motivates your employees, nor to fall into ready-made recipes. Your role is to create the conditions for everyone to express what drives them... and to connect these aspirations to the collective project.
A team needs a shared sense of purpose, beyond the day-to-day tasks. Knowing why you're doing something, what you're contributing to and what you're building together: these are fundamentals for all generations.
To set up :
Example: At a team meeting, a marketing manager takes 5 minutes to explain how a campaign in preparation fits into the overall growth strategy. Result: more involvement, less mechanical execution.
One is looking to make rapid progress. Another wants to stabilize his position. A third feels useful when passing on his knowledge. It's up to you toidentify these dynamics and give everyone the opportunity to get involved in their own way.
To implement :
Example: An IT manager realizes that a senior developer is beginning to tire of purely technical matters. He offers him the opportunity to pilot the integration of new arrivals for 3 months. The employee finds a new sense of purpose, without having to change jobs.
Recognition is a universal lever, but it doesn't take the same form for everyone. Some prefer unobtrusive feedback, others a show of appreciation in a meeting. Some want recognition for progress, others for performance.
Test it in your management routine:
Example: A manager gets into the habit of opening each team meeting with a "spotlight" on a useful contribution made during the week. Little by little, her colleagues do the same among themselves.
Rather than seeking to satisfy each generation individually, rely on clarity, trust and cooperation. These are the three pillars that enable each person to contribute in his or her own way, while moving forward in a collective direction. A good intergenerational manager is not one who masters the clichés associated with each generation.
He's the one who knows best:
Intergenerational management refers to the set of managerial practices designed to enable several generations to collaborate effectively within the same team. It's not a question of adapting one's style to each age group, but of creating a common framework that respects differences in rhythm, vision of work and priorities. Managers need to know how to make the most of complementary profiles, break down stereotypes and encourage lasting commitment, whatever the age.
Intergenerational management is based on clarity, flexibility and listening. It's not a question of adapting everything to each individual, but of establishing a solid collective framework (objectives, functioning, values), then leaving each person the freedom to fit into it according to his or her own way of working. An effective manager will also know how to vary his or her posture according to profile, while cultivating a collaborative leadership style: bringing out ideas, encouraging exchanges between generations, valuing complementarities and adjusting recognition to each person's needs.
The most common challenges are related to differences in communication, pace, relationship to authority or tools. The real challenge is to avoid stereotypes and establish a common framework, while leaving room for individuality.
Discover all our courses and workshops to address the most critical management and leadership challenges.