This content may be of interest to you
Resources
Mental load at work is still too often perceived as an individual problem. We talk about resilience, personal stress management, or the ability to cope. This interpretation is misleading.
In reality, mental overload is mainly caused by the way work is organized. Unclear expectations, competing priorities, lack of decision-making, and an accumulation of demands. Even skilled and committed employees can find themselves in difficulty when the framework no longer allows them to prioritize and make decisions calmly.
Mental load is not linked to individual fragility, but to the way work is organized. In this context, the role of the manager is central. Preventing mental load involves organizing work to make it sustainable, without compromising on standards or long-term performance.
In many teams, mental load does not come from an excess of work, but from a lack of clarity. Employees move forward without clear guidelines and feel they have to decide for themselves what really matters.
When the framework is unclear, every task becomes mentally taxing. Decisions take longer, doubts accumulate, and concentration is fragmented. Teams then spend more time wondering what to do than actually producing.
Concrete example
In a cross-functional team, requests come in via email, instant messages, and informal meetings. Nothing is formalized. Employees juggle multiple topics, constantly interrupt their work, and end their days feeling like they never really make any progress.
Clarifying priorities is a fundamental managerial task. Not prioritizing amounts to transferring the burden of decision-making to the team, in addition to the operational burden.
When everything is urgent, mental load immediately increases. Constant urgency prevents us from planning ahead, organizing, and taking a breather at work. Identifying priorities means accepting what is not a priority, at least temporarily. This sacrifice is essential to avoid accumulation and distraction .
Concrete example
A manager treats all requests as urgent so as not to block anything. The team works on too many topics at once, accumulates delays, and sees quality decline. By setting three clearly defined weekly priorities, the situation stabilizes. Employees know where to focus their energy and stop spreading themselves too thin.
Some best practices to apply:
Mental overload does not come solely from the volume of work. It also arises from different interpretations of the same objective. Without clarification, everyone projects their own expectations, which are often higher than necessary.
Implicit expectations generate an invisible but costly mental burden. Employees overinvest for fear of doing something wrong, without knowing whether this effort is actually expected.
Concrete example
Two employees are working on the same deliverable. One aims for a very high level of detail, while the other seeks to work quickly. The manager rephrases the objective, specifies the expected level of quality and the scope. The cognitive overload disappears immediately.
In the absence of clear decisions, the team must produce results while making choices. This dual responsibility increases mental load and weakens the working environment. Clarifying decisions does not mean making operations more rigid, but rather securing the framework to allow the team to focus on what is essential.
Concrete example
Several departments send conflicting requests. The manager lets the team "organize itself." Soon, multitasking becomes the norm, priorities are constantly changing, and mental overload sets in.
In many organizations, mental overload does not come from the number of priorities, but from the accumulation of requests. Each new request is added to the previous ones without ever replacing anything.
Without explicit rules, everything becomes urgent and teams are constantly working in degraded mode. Setting prioritization rules allows you to regain control and handle new requests without creating mechanical overload.
Concrete example
In a support team, each customer request is treated as an addition. After a few weeks, deadlines explode and fatigue sets in. The manager sets a simple rule: any new priority replaces another. Trade-offs become clearer and the workload becomes manageable again.
Mental load is based on a simple gap: that between workload and available resources (time, skills, energy). When this gap is not discussed, the overload becomes structural.
Making the workload visible is a prerequisite for any regulation. It is also an act of responsible management, which helps to break out of collective denial about what the team can actually handle.
When priorities are not clearly defined, decisions are made implicitly, often in a hurry. Everyone makes their own decisions, based on the pressure they are under or the person they are talking to. Employees then bear the burden of choices that should be collective, which greatly increases their mental load.
The prioritization matrix shifts the decision from individual perception to a shared framework. It is not used to rank tasks, but to structure the discussion so that everyone can decide together what really deserves the team's attention. By objectifying the criteria, the manager restores clarity. Decisions become visible, accepted, and understandable to all.
Concrete example
During weekly meetings, the team uses an urgency/importance/added value matrix. Low-impact topics are put on hold. Decisions become visible, discussed, and collectively accepted.
Mental overload often occurs when capacity limits are never expressed. As long as the team "holds up," the organization considers that everything is manageable. The load then becomes invisible, until the breaking point is reached.
Making these limits visible means accepting to look at the workload as it really is, not as we would like it to be. This does not mean lowering standards, but adjusting the framework to preserve quality and mental health. This visibility allows managers to renegotiate, arbitrate, and protect the team before overload becomes a permanent feature.
Concrete example
A manager accepts new assignments without assessing the team's actual capacity. By making the existing workload visible, he renegotiates deadlines with human resources and avoids burnout.
Finding the right work pace is key to preventing mental fatigue from setting in over time.
Workplace mental overload often builds up silently. Employees persevere, compensate, and prioritize on their own until they reach breaking point. Management rituals make the burden visible before it becomes overwhelming. They transform a vague sense of unease into a concrete issue that can be addressed .
In an environment where there are many demands, the brain remains on constant alert. Without a regular framework, teams spend their time reacting rather than moving forward.
The three priorities ritual helps stabilize the work environment. It creates a collective point of reference, reminds everyone what really matters during a given period, and limits distractions.
Concrete example
Every Monday, the team sets its three priorities. Unnecessary requests decrease, decisions are made more quickly, and the framework becomes more stable.
This logic is also based on respecting time and concentration, which are essential for avoiding accumulation and mental overload.
One of the mechanisms that most contributes to mental overload is the accumulation of projects. Without clear rules, each new task is added to the previous ones, even when capacity is already saturated. The "stop or continue" rule forces us to ask a simple but fundamental question: what can be stopped to make room? It transforms automatic addition into conscious decision-making.
Concrete example
Previously, each project was added to the previous ones. With the "stop or continue" rule, the team avoids backlogs and regains flexibility.
Mental load becomes problematic when it is identified too late. Waiting until exhaustion sets in before taking action amounts to treating the consequences rather than the causes.
Addressing mental load in one-on-one meetings is not about delving into psychology, but rather talking about the actual work: organization , priorities, constraints. Taking action early on allows you to adjust the framework before imbalances become entrenched.
Concrete example
An employee says they are fine but keeps falling behind schedule. By analyzing the tasks to be completed, the manager identifies an invisible cognitive overload and adjusts priorities before the situation deteriorates.
Mental overload almost always sends signals before exhaustion sets in. However, it is important to recognize these signals and interpret them as organizational indicators rather than individual weaknesses. These signals are often visible in the way people work, well before formal warnings are issued.
Some signs to watch out for:
Preventing mental overload at work does not mean asking employees to be more resilient. It means clarifying, prioritizing, and arbitrating to make work sustainable.
By structuring the framework and rules of the game, managers reduce cognitive overload, protect the mental health of teams, and maintain high standards and sustainable performance, working closely with human resources.
Mental load at work is still too often perceived as an individual problem. We talk about resilience, personal stress management, or the ability to cope. This interpretation is misleading.
In reality, mental overload is mainly caused by the way work is organized. Unclear expectations, competing priorities, lack of decision-making, and an accumulation of demands. Even skilled and committed employees can find themselves in difficulty when the framework no longer allows them to prioritize and make decisions calmly.
Mental load is not linked to individual fragility, but to the way work is organized. In this context, the role of the manager is central. Preventing mental load involves organizing work to make it sustainable, without compromising on standards or long-term performance.
In many teams, mental load does not come from an excess of work, but from a lack of clarity. Employees move forward without clear guidelines and feel they have to decide for themselves what really matters.
When the framework is unclear, every task becomes mentally taxing. Decisions take longer, doubts accumulate, and concentration is fragmented. Teams then spend more time wondering what to do than actually producing.
Concrete example
In a cross-functional team, requests come in via email, instant messages, and informal meetings. Nothing is formalized. Employees juggle multiple topics, constantly interrupt their work, and end their days feeling like they never really make any progress.
Clarifying priorities is a fundamental managerial task. Not prioritizing amounts to transferring the burden of decision-making to the team, in addition to the operational burden.
When everything is urgent, mental load immediately increases. Constant urgency prevents us from planning ahead, organizing, and taking a breather at work. Identifying priorities means accepting what is not a priority, at least temporarily. This sacrifice is essential to avoid accumulation and distraction .
Concrete example
A manager treats all requests as urgent so as not to block anything. The team works on too many topics at once, accumulates delays, and sees quality decline. By setting three clearly defined weekly priorities, the situation stabilizes. Employees know where to focus their energy and stop spreading themselves too thin.
Some best practices to apply:
Mental overload does not come solely from the volume of work. It also arises from different interpretations of the same objective. Without clarification, everyone projects their own expectations, which are often higher than necessary.
Implicit expectations generate an invisible but costly mental burden. Employees overinvest for fear of doing something wrong, without knowing whether this effort is actually expected.
Concrete example
Two employees are working on the same deliverable. One aims for a very high level of detail, while the other seeks to work quickly. The manager rephrases the objective, specifies the expected level of quality and the scope. The cognitive overload disappears immediately.
In the absence of clear decisions, the team must produce results while making choices. This dual responsibility increases mental load and weakens the working environment. Clarifying decisions does not mean making operations more rigid, but rather securing the framework to allow the team to focus on what is essential.
Concrete example
Several departments send conflicting requests. The manager lets the team "organize itself." Soon, multitasking becomes the norm, priorities are constantly changing, and mental overload sets in.
In many organizations, mental overload does not come from the number of priorities, but from the accumulation of requests. Each new request is added to the previous ones without ever replacing anything.
Without explicit rules, everything becomes urgent and teams are constantly working in degraded mode. Setting prioritization rules allows you to regain control and handle new requests without creating mechanical overload.
Concrete example
In a support team, each customer request is treated as an addition. After a few weeks, deadlines explode and fatigue sets in. The manager sets a simple rule: any new priority replaces another. Trade-offs become clearer and the workload becomes manageable again.
Mental load is based on a simple gap: that between workload and available resources (time, skills, energy). When this gap is not discussed, the overload becomes structural.
Making the workload visible is a prerequisite for any regulation. It is also an act of responsible management, which helps to break out of collective denial about what the team can actually handle.
When priorities are not clearly defined, decisions are made implicitly, often in a hurry. Everyone makes their own decisions, based on the pressure they are under or the person they are talking to. Employees then bear the burden of choices that should be collective, which greatly increases their mental load.
The prioritization matrix shifts the decision from individual perception to a shared framework. It is not used to rank tasks, but to structure the discussion so that everyone can decide together what really deserves the team's attention. By objectifying the criteria, the manager restores clarity. Decisions become visible, accepted, and understandable to all.
Concrete example
During weekly meetings, the team uses an urgency/importance/added value matrix. Low-impact topics are put on hold. Decisions become visible, discussed, and collectively accepted.
Mental overload often occurs when capacity limits are never expressed. As long as the team "holds up," the organization considers that everything is manageable. The load then becomes invisible, until the breaking point is reached.
Making these limits visible means accepting to look at the workload as it really is, not as we would like it to be. This does not mean lowering standards, but adjusting the framework to preserve quality and mental health. This visibility allows managers to renegotiate, arbitrate, and protect the team before overload becomes a permanent feature.
Concrete example
A manager accepts new assignments without assessing the team's actual capacity. By making the existing workload visible, he renegotiates deadlines with human resources and avoids burnout.
Finding the right work pace is key to preventing mental fatigue from setting in over time.
Workplace mental overload often builds up silently. Employees persevere, compensate, and prioritize on their own until they reach breaking point. Management rituals make the burden visible before it becomes overwhelming. They transform a vague sense of unease into a concrete issue that can be addressed .
In an environment where there are many demands, the brain remains on constant alert. Without a regular framework, teams spend their time reacting rather than moving forward.
The three priorities ritual helps stabilize the work environment. It creates a collective point of reference, reminds everyone what really matters during a given period, and limits distractions.
Concrete example
Every Monday, the team sets its three priorities. Unnecessary requests decrease, decisions are made more quickly, and the framework becomes more stable.
This logic is also based on respecting time and concentration, which are essential for avoiding accumulation and mental overload.
One of the mechanisms that most contributes to mental overload is the accumulation of projects. Without clear rules, each new task is added to the previous ones, even when capacity is already saturated. The "stop or continue" rule forces us to ask a simple but fundamental question: what can be stopped to make room? It transforms automatic addition into conscious decision-making.
Concrete example
Previously, each project was added to the previous ones. With the "stop or continue" rule, the team avoids backlogs and regains flexibility.
Mental load becomes problematic when it is identified too late. Waiting until exhaustion sets in before taking action amounts to treating the consequences rather than the causes.
Addressing mental load in one-on-one meetings is not about delving into psychology, but rather talking about the actual work: organization , priorities, constraints. Taking action early on allows you to adjust the framework before imbalances become entrenched.
Concrete example
An employee says they are fine but keeps falling behind schedule. By analyzing the tasks to be completed, the manager identifies an invisible cognitive overload and adjusts priorities before the situation deteriorates.
Mental overload almost always sends signals before exhaustion sets in. However, it is important to recognize these signals and interpret them as organizational indicators rather than individual weaknesses. These signals are often visible in the way people work, well before formal warnings are issued.
Some signs to watch out for:
Preventing mental overload at work does not mean asking employees to be more resilient. It means clarifying, prioritizing, and arbitrating to make work sustainable.
By structuring the framework and rules of the game, managers reduce cognitive overload, protect the mental health of teams, and maintain high standards and sustainable performance, working closely with human resources.
Discover all our courses and workshops to address the most critical management and leadership challenges.
Quality certification has been awarded for the following category of actions: TRAINING INITIATIVES
Training organisation registered under the number 11755339875. This registration does not imply state approval.
.svg)
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
